cuatro.5.2 Regular Polysemy

Our basic group of experiments now offers views on the concern, what exactly is a sufficient computational model getting typical polysemy? Especially, we have revealed the treatment of typical polysemy when it comes from independent categories is not enough. Remember that the inspiration for the studies exhibited contained in this section was the fresh new theory one polysemous adjectives exhibit a beneficial linguistic behavior that participates about very first categories active in the normal polysemy, hence yielding function opinions that will be among that from the newest earliest classes (cf. Contour step 1). Thus, we’d expected you to https://datingranking.net/jeevansathi-review polysemous adjectives means good homogeneous number of lexical circumstances, distinguisheded correctly of the undeniable fact that it showcase features out of for every single class to a certain degree. Although not, which expectation is not borne call at the outcome of your studies. To that particular respect, it is striking you to QR adjectives (polysemous ranging from a beneficial qualitative and you will a great relational learning) is actually give throughout most of the groups in most solutions. They are not defined as an excellent homogeneous classification, nor given that distinctive from the rest. Crucially, just like the pointed out inside Point 4.dos, the difference within ability beliefs off polysemous adjectives and those of your own basic kinds aren’t sufficiently strong enough in order to encourage a separate group. Continue reading »